The bill, filed by Sen. Gayle Harrell, R-Stuart, aims to safeguard Florida state parks and their natural resources from the potential damage of golf courses, pickleball courts, and luxury resorts. *
Background of the Bill
The bill stems from last year’s controversy surrounding the state’s “Great Outdoors Initiative,” a plan to add golf courses, resort-style lodges, and pickleball courts to state parks. The proposal sparked widespread criticism and was eventually pulled back after the public outcry. *
Key Provisions of the Bill
- Construction in state parks cannot harm natural resources, native habitats, or historical sites.
- The bill requires public hearings for large-scale developments.
- No commercialization is allowed, and the focus remains on preserving the natural beauty of the parks.
Some lawmakers had proposed an amendment that would have allowed facilities like golf courses, tennis courts, and pickleball courts if they were deemed not to cause “substantial harm” to natural resources or native habitats. However, this amendment was ultimately rejected due to concerns that it would create ambiguity and loopholes for future developments. *
Reactions from Various Stakeholders
- Travis Moore, a lobbyist for Friends of the Everglades, said the proposed amendment would have addressed lodging issues but still left room for interpretation.
- Beth Alvi, Audubon Florida’s senior director of policy, emphasized the need for clarity in the bill, stating that the proposed amendment would have created ambiguity and loopholes.
- Sen. Don Gaetz, R-Niceville, suggested that the amendment should be revised to allow for “soft” maintenance needs at state parks but eliminate any commercialization.
A clear line between allowed and prohibited uses of state parks is the main goal of Harrell’s bill, and it aims to draw a distinction that would be difficult to navigate with the proposed amendment in place. *
Table: Comparison of Proposed Amendment and Harrell’s Bill
| Amendment | Harrell’s Bill |
|---|---|
| Allows facilities like golf courses, tennis courts, and pickleball courts if deemed not to cause “substantial harm” | Prohibits construction in parks that harms natural resources, native habitats, or historical sites |
*
Conclusion
The Senate Fiscal Policy committee has backed Harrell’s bill, and it will now move to the full Senate. With the House having unanimously supported its version of the bill, it is likely that the bill will pass both chambers before the May 2 end of the legislative session. This marks a significant victory for the state’s environmental and conservation groups, who have worked tirelessly to protect Florida’s natural resources and preserve the state parks for future generations. The bill is a crucial step in safeguarding the state parks and their natural resources, and it demonstrates the importance of public involvement and transparency in the decision-making process. By drawing a clear line between allowed and prohibited uses of state parks, Harrell’s bill ensures that the state’s natural beauty and resources are protected for years to come.
